Supreme Court’s redefinition of ‘sex’ a loss for our constitutional order [More]Glad to see an "impartial court" focused on "progressive" priorities so vital to perpetual Democrat rule.
Who needs checks and balances and separation of powers anyway...?
[Via Mack H]
UPDATE: Glenn Reynolds is not surprised.
[Via Michael G]
1 comment:
The purported "checks and balances" of separation of powers is an illusory security, transparently evident every time the issue in question concerns rulers vs. subjects.
Post a Comment