Pelosi: House will use 'every arrow in our quiver' to stop Trump Supreme Court nominee [More]
As long as she's bringing up analogies, anyone who needs that many arrows to win doesn't have any business voting.
And as long as we're being consistent:
andJust dug up this clip of Obama in 2016:
— Kelb Hull (@CalebJHull) September 19, 2020
"When there is a vacancy on the SCOTUS, the President is to nominate someone, the Senate is to consider that nomination... There's no unwritten law that says that it can only be done on off-years. That's not in the Constitution text." pic.twitter.com/vrOi3DrkJN
Biden in 2016:
— Kelb Hull (@CalebJHull) September 19, 2020
"I would go forward with the confirmation process as chairman. Even a few months before a presidential election... just as the Constitution requires." pic.twitter.com/r0WVdlitOK
1 comment:
It seems everyone is missing the point:
Obama was already a Lame Duck at the tail end of his second term.
The voters would have no way to express their approval / disapproval in 2016.
Trump is at the end of his FIRST term - big difference.
He will NOT be the 'next' President if he achieves Victory but will instead serve his SECOND term.
Understand now?
Post a Comment