California Sues US Regulator in Bid to Deter 'Ghost Guns' [More]
No one is suing for "gun-free school zones" and "compulsory education" requiring people to put themselves in harm's way?
Security is provided by one unarmed sheriff's deputy and nine "campus supervisors" who act as guards...
No one is admitting how all the other laws broken here which did not deter a thing? Instead what we see is thinly disguised advocacy for universal registration, which itself proved utterly ineffective when you consider the teenage killer's father was a "prohibited person" (leading once again to an inconvenient truth everyone denies).
Here's the complaint:
2 comments:
I have an dog that's seriously old, mostly blind, and not too bright. Sometimes overnight he just can't wait until someone gets up, so he leaves a trail of logs on the rug, and the first one up has to clean up after him. There's no use chiding him for it or trying to teach him not to, he's too far along to leanr and he's going to do it until he dies.
Whenever I hear that Xavier Becerra is suing a gunnie, I think of my dog.
Even if every "ghost gun" were magically removed from the face of the earth, they're still not able to address a major flaw in their gun control regime:
NO SINGLE PART OF AN AR-15 MEETS THE FEDERAL DEFINITION OF A FIREARM!
https://apnews.com/article/396bbedbf4963a28bda99e7793ee6366
"Federal regulations define a firearm’s “frame” or “receiver” as the piece considered to be the gun itself. But in an AR-15, the receiver is split into upper and lower parts — and some of the components listed in the definition are contained in the upper half. That has led judges to rule that a lower receiver alone cannot be considered a gun."
Oops!
Post a Comment