Ultimately, the article concludes that the individual right to bear arms still has relevance for public defense and security. This fact should warrant consideration when determining the scope of the right, including that the arms protected by the Second Amendment should continue to include those arms whose primary value is public security rather than individual self-defense. [More]
Shoot, the Founders could'a told 'em that.
I'm just waiting for it to dawn on our "Second Amendment lawsuit" filers.
[Via Michael G]
No comments:
Post a Comment