Friday, January 29, 2021

Silver Lining -- For Now

Prognosis2% chance of being enacted according to Skopos Labs... [More]

I thought I'd already posted on H.R. 127: Sabika Sheikh Firearm Licensing and Registration Act, but now can't find it, and several of you have sent me copies of the bill. I always like to look at GovTrack for their prognosis-- we'll see how that proves out, what with the eye-rolling gun-grabber feeding frenzy forming. 

It figures ol' 10-Box Sheila would try for more edicts following yet another "gun-free zone" slaughter, what with the Houston Chronicle using it as an opportunity to imply blame for "the pervasiveness of gun culture in Texas," to imagine the bullying of "a Muslim girl with brown skin" that no one says ever happened (but nonetheless implying xenophobia and racism in a "conservative" community), all the while extolling the virtues of "gun-free," tranquil and tolerant Pakistan.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

We are the only country in the world that has a Second Amendment, which is included in the BILL(list) of RIGHTS ......................... of the PEOPLE
Find one government in all of history that banned it's own ARMED FORCES from "Keeping and Bearing" ARMS.
Find one government in the history of humanity that felt a need to document a "RIGHT" for it's ARMED FORCES to possess ARMS.
Oppressive Governments ALWAYS ban the People'S RIGHT to arms.
The claim that the Founding Fathers wrote the 2nd Amendment to give Our ARMED FORCES a "right" to keep and carry ARMS is S-T-U-P-I-D.
The only reason for the Second Amendment is to clearly spell-out the GOD GIVEN RIGHT of INDIVIDUALS to keep & bear ARMS.
The only reason for the BILL(list) of RIGHTS was to codify INDIVIDUALS' GOD GIVEN RIGHTS.
Has there ever been a government that was not chock full of it's "rights" up to and including declaring itself to be the Lord God Almighty?! (Rome, Egypt, Israel,etc)
Does the 1st Amendment mean the GOVERNMENT is allowed to give speeches? Try shutting up any Politician. But THEY would LOVE to shut YOU up, hence the FIRST Amendment.
Anyone who tells you the 2nd Amendment applies to the Army or State Militia, is telling you they think you are STUPID.
There has NEVER been a government that felt it had to codify it's army's/soldier's "RIGHT" to "Keep and BEAR ARMS" because there has NEVER been a government that refused to allow It's own soldiers to KEEP and BEAR ARMS!
The Second Amendment was written for the People, like the other 9 Amendments in the Bill of Rights. This was confirmed by the SCOTUS in the DC vs Heller decision, where they stated that the "People" in the Second Amendment were the same "People" that are mentioned in the First and Fourth Amendment.
The 2nd Amendment clearly codifies the “right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms”, and certainly not “the Militia”.
Why would "the Militia", a type of army manned by citizen-soldiers as opposed to full-time "regulars", need a constitutional amendment to guarantee they have the right "to keep and bear arms"?
Is there any specific statement anywhere in the Constitution that the army Congress is empowered to raise has the “right to keep and bear arms"? Of course not. ............. That is assumed.

the 2nd amendment,, specifies that the RIGHT to bear arms is the right of the people,, NOT the militia,,,, it is the people who will make up the militia,, but the right is not the right of a "well regulated militia" it is the right of the people, We the people were BORN WITH UNALIENABLE RIGHTS, meaning they come from GOD.

... the Bolshevik-Left insists there is NO GOD so they can deny all your GOD given RIGHTS.

CPB said...

Does it go against The Constitution? Check...

Does it go against The Bill Of RIGHTS? Check...

Then it is null and void. SIMPLE AS THAT. Check...

THEY ALL can go pound sand. BFTTW. Check...