Gun maker offers $33M to settle suit by Sandy Hook families [More]
The gun maker or insurers?
Additional notes on reflection: Prepare for the feeding frenzy that happens when sharks smell blood in the water. They may be trying to save themselves but they're serving up everyone else. Admitting that I haven't versed myself in this particular case, is it wrong of me to hope that, sensing weakness, the plaintiffs turn the offer down and demand more? I'm wondering if greedy lawyers making it too expensive to surrender may be the best option here.
3 comments:
Doesn't matter whether it's the company or the insurer, the message is clear, we are the cause of the crime and will roll over. Not a case of paying a nuisance to go away but opening the door to thousands of suits.
PAY FOR WHAT?????
Prohibited Asshole kills owner and steals gun and commits crime(s). How is the manufacturer responsible????????
If they pay that I’ll NEVER purchase another one of their products
They should have told them (and in the process every other hoplophobe), "F@#K YOU!...See you at the trial" and use the $33M to bankrupt every single one of the plaintiffs.
Post a Comment