"Assault weapons are a subclass of unreasonably dangerous firearms
developed and adopted for their military effectiveness, with features
appropriate for military and some law-enforcement purposes, but which
are not commonly owned generally, or commonly used for self-defense,"
Fader and his colleagues wrote. [More]
Fader and his colleagues, of course, are goddam hive insect liars. Funny, how the "progressives" want it both ways, with the Miller opinion essentially saying "protected" guns
had to have demonstrable military utility.
And thanks for that "in common use" anchor weight, "conservative/originalist/constructionist" Scalia. Not only does it drag us down, it effectively denies any new developments in arms to We the People.
Looks like some of us are just going to have to ignore the tyrants' edicts and do what we know is right.
Makes a hell of a lot more sense than the Gunwalker-ignoring Prozi propaganda to advance a disarmament agenda this comment poster is responding to.