This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
And we can either let it devour us, or send it howling back into the darkness.
7 comments:
Anonymous
said...
More children sacrificed on the altar of political correctness. Their blood runs into the overflowing cups of the anti-gun groups, and is thirstily drunk by the sheep who would have us all on that altar. I don't know who is worse. Slavering scum want to slaughter us and our children, and the antis (anti gun,self defense,freedom,) want us to remain helpless so that the scum will inherit the earth. It is like watching cheerleaders at Nazi death camp. It will all end badly, and it will defy description.
Don't know if I have the words to express how I feel. Sean did a good job. All I can bring myself to wonder is how the hell does someone allow themselves to get THAT EVIL? What is going through their mind?
The anti's will do their blood dance. The sheeple will bleat for more 'protection' and further government intrusions. At the cost of more of our Freedoms and Liberties being lost, of course. And this despite clear evidence to the contrary, that further infringements will only make things worse.
What is really frustrating, is that even many of our fellow gun owners will nod their heads in agreement that more 'controls' are necessary.
How many gun owners actual first thought was; 'I wish I'd had been there, he'd have been dead after the first or second shot'?
Was not the founders whole intent for an armed populace, keeping evil at bay? From whatever source it might arise, whether it be foreign or domestic? Was not each citizen expected to do their part?Is not that sound reasoning? How is it then, that so many are blinded to this fact, and refuse to accept the truth?
Our, supposed, 'civilization' is in a very bad state of affairs. When common sense is given such little regard, how much longer will our society survive?
One responsible armed citizen, aware of their duty as a citizen, could have stopped this tragedy with one shot.
The people whom have shrilly cried for 'gun control' are directly, and indirectly, responsible for this and other tragedys. The blood belongs on their hands. Not on the people that would have acted, had they not been perversely restrained from doing so.
It's time to pull the kid gloves off, and really start slamming the truth home, hard. And this, while we still have some semblance of a society worth fighting for. The consequence of not doing so, will lead to anarchy and totalitarian control...
But, as we all know, the hoplophobes will insist that this horrible incident offers further "proof" that we need to pass more stringent gun laws, which will only serve to further disarm decent people, rendering them even less able to fight back against scum such as Roberts. And the greatest danger of that is that enough of the sheeple out there, who pull levers in voting booths, will believe these hoplophobes and act upon their disinformation!
I offer this response in the hopes that you will use it when confronted with a person that believes more restrictions on arms will prevent such atrocity in the future.
"What? You didn't think the victims and their teachers were helpless enough?" "Why do you want them even more helpless?"What do you plan?"
And don't let the bastards off without an answer to the question. Don't let them restate the premise of the question, make them answer the question or retreat.
7 comments:
More children sacrificed on the altar of political correctness. Their blood runs into the overflowing cups of the anti-gun groups, and is thirstily drunk by the sheep who would have us all on that altar. I don't know who is worse. Slavering scum want to slaughter us and our children, and the antis (anti gun,self defense,freedom,) want us to remain helpless so that the scum will inherit the earth. It is like watching cheerleaders at Nazi death camp. It will all end badly, and it will defy description.
Don't know if I have the words to express how I feel. Sean did a good job. All I can bring myself to wonder is how the hell does someone allow themselves to get THAT EVIL? What is going through their mind?
The anti's will do their blood dance. The sheeple will bleat for more 'protection' and further government intrusions. At the cost of more of our Freedoms and Liberties being lost, of course. And this despite clear evidence to the contrary, that further infringements will only make things worse.
What is really frustrating, is that even many of our fellow gun owners will nod their heads in agreement that more 'controls' are necessary.
How many gun owners actual first thought was; 'I wish I'd had been there, he'd have been dead after the first or second shot'?
Was not the founders whole intent for an armed populace, keeping evil at bay? From whatever source it might arise, whether it be foreign or domestic? Was not each citizen expected to do their part?Is not that sound reasoning? How is it then, that so many are blinded to this fact, and refuse to accept the truth?
Our, supposed, 'civilization' is in a very bad state of affairs. When common sense is given such little regard, how much longer will our society survive?
One responsible armed citizen, aware of their duty as a citizen, could have stopped this tragedy with one shot.
The people whom have shrilly cried for 'gun control' are directly, and indirectly, responsible for this and other tragedys. The blood belongs on their hands. Not on the people that would have acted, had they not been perversely restrained from doing so.
It's time to pull the kid gloves off, and really start slamming the truth home, hard. And this, while we still have some semblance of a society worth fighting for. The consequence of not doing so, will lead to anarchy and totalitarian control...
But, as we all know, the hoplophobes will insist that this horrible incident offers further "proof" that we need to pass more stringent gun laws, which will only serve to further disarm decent people, rendering them even less able to fight back against scum such as Roberts.
And the greatest danger of that is that enough of the sheeple out there, who pull levers in voting booths, will believe these hoplophobes and act upon their disinformation!
It is hard to wrap your mind around what this scumbag did to those girls.
e. david, your post sums things up better than I could have. I mentioned your comments on my site.
It bears repeating:
He seemed bent on killing young girls and apparently figured he could succeed at the lightly guarded schoolhouse, authorities said.
Peet
Tremendous comments people! Thank you for reasserting that we are not all collectively blind!
I will update my post on this incident and link here.
I offer this response in the hopes that you will use it when confronted with a person that believes more restrictions on arms will prevent such atrocity in the future.
"What? You didn't think the victims and their teachers were helpless enough?" "Why do you want them even more helpless?"What do you plan?"
And don't let the bastards off without an answer to the question. Don't let them restate the premise of the question, make them answer the question or retreat.
Post a Comment