How many independent sworn statements by people with nothing to gain by lying and everything to lose if they do are needed to establish credibility?
[Via David R. Olofson]
Part I
Part II
Saturday, May 17, 2008
Down the Rabbit Hole: Part III
How many independent sworn statements by people with nothing to gain by lying and everything to lose if they do are needed to establish credibility?
[Via David R. Olofson]
Part I
Part II
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
They keep pushing for something they don't really want. They must think it will be limited to a manageable size.
They may be right. But some of their own homes may be sites of sad singing and slow walking if they don't get back inside the law.
I hate to admit they may be correct in their assessment of the risks of their unlawful behavior, but in light of how many "pragmatists" counted among our number and the number of people unaware or outright opposed to freedom and the 2A, there is good chance they can attain their goals in walkover.
I am certain there are several "leaders in the gun rights movement" that would kneel preemptively. You know who these pretenders are also,David.
You don't really think these sworn statements are going to make a difference against BATFEces, do you?
I doubt he does, Crotalus. I think he is just making sure no one has an excuse to say "We don't know all the details. They must have had a good reason."
You know how many times we've seen cowards use that type of distraction for cover.
Post a Comment