That anyone could base such an assertion on his own interpretation and not on the writings of the people who conceived and wrote the Second Amendment is beyond astonishing--and sounds like an artifice of falsity.
Dennis Hannick fires back at a fictional interpretation of the Second Amendment.
It looks like the paper appreciated the holes he shot in the collective rights argument, as well.
1 comment:
That has been THE most commented on article I've ever seen. People are blasting Miller from EVERY angle. Poor, poor Mr. Miller! Bet you he's looking for a place to hide!
Post a Comment