Friday, October 20, 2006

I'll Take "Despicable Tyrant Wannabes" for $400, Alex

Who is Kathy Ryg?

Well, with her in power, your rights will be in "Jeopardy"...

[Thanks to HZ]

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

This woman is the worst (and most incompetent!) liar on the subject os "assault weapons" I have ever seen! As to her flyer, "No more excuses", O.K. No more "excuses". Now, it's "COME AND TAKE 'EM, IF YOU DARE!!"

BTW, she's as ugly as her politics are!

E. David Quammen said...

There is beauty to be found in her spewings!

If they are resorting to out-and-out lies, that means they have 'shot their load', and are now out of ammo.!

Now is the time for us to redouble our efforts, and hit back hard, fast and frequently with the truth. This is probably the best thing that could have happened!

Truth stands alone, it doesn't need propped up. But, it does need announced and spread. We show the truth, which proves them to be liars, and people will naturally turn away from them.

In this instance, silence is by no means, 'golden'.

Anonymous said...

Amen, E.David!

Anonymous said...

Democrat Duckworth took a page right out of Ryg's book with the postcard of lies idea.

http://www.isra.org/quick/dems_gun_mail.jpg

Nate

me said...

Peter Roskam seems to be rather intelligent, he's taking a stand and supporting "responsible" gun laws.

Why is abstinence from sex NOT taught in school, but abstinence from guns IS? Drivers education is taught and cars are as dangerous, if not more so then any gun. They are more difficult to operate and can be used in the commission of many, many crimes.

Public and government controlled schools (how many school shootings have occurred at private schools?) are useless these days, serving only as indoctrination centers for the communists. If we actually wanted to cure school violence we would do away with public schools.

Sorry, Ryg...yeah, not surprising that she would stoop to that level when that other beast Reno used the same tactics. I'm going to invent a term here,

"assault politician": a coward and liar of the highest order, who through conspiracy seeks to make the general public less free, at greater risk from criminals, and to deprive individuals of their God given rights

Is there a law that can be used on them, since they are intentionally deceptive and it clearly is a conspiracy to deprive us of our rights?

E. David Quammen said...

hairy hobbit - "Is there a law that can be used on them, since they are intentionally deceptive and it clearly is a conspiracy to deprive us of our rights?"

Why yes, there is, now that you mention it. And, it's actually a combination of a few different codes of law: God's; Nature's; and; (Right)Reason. All of which are foundation stones of our INTENDED government system. (The Law of Man is set aside in this discussion, for it in itself, is the problem).

Any of the above listed get transgressed, and there will sooner or later, be a price that must be paid and penalty exacted. And, as a general rule, the longer it is allowed the worse that it becomes. (And greater the inevitable penalty).

Unfortunately, if we are silent about it, we are as guilty as if we had concurred with the evil. And will receive punishment as well, though perhaps not as harsh.

In other words; 'what goes around comes around'. Or, if you prefer; 'you reap what you sow' (with accrued interest added).

Anonymous said...

R.J.-Never make a personal attack on these people. That's a democrat/liberal trick. When they have nothing to offer, in the way of rational argument, they try
to demean people with personal
attacks. ie. too much make up, hair looks like a fright wig etc.

Anonymous said...

Good point, K.J. Will avoid it next time.

Anonymous said...

BTW, the M2 shown in the campaign ad is straight from wickipedia.
If they got the pic from there, they should have been able to read
that the M2 wighs 84 lbs. and the tripod weighs 44 lbs. It is physically impossible for a person
to carry and shoot it! When she calls the M2 a hunting firearm, is she actually that clueless or is she lying to her constituents?