So much for expecting even-handedness. You'll note no category for "Religious Left Watch," which can only mean that the Separatists endorse and exploit holes in "the wall" for them.
I posted a couple comments on their blog pointing out their double standards.
3 comments:
You seem to get the same response I get on other blogs...when you present the facts their responses stop.
Yeah, funny how it always seems to work out that way with liars and frauds, isn't it?
We'll see if they let it stand, I expect not. I expect this truth is much too harsh and violates their policies on decorum, however if the truth violates one sensibilities perhaps they should be acting differently? I don't expect they will. One consolation is that these people may be united in this one area, but by knowing themselves they also know they dare not turn their backs on each other in any other venue. They can never be among trusted confederates because they are aware they are not trustworthy. Below are my comments to the riffraff.
"David Codrea brings a point that AU has repeatedly dodged. They violate their own stated purpose. That is hypocrisy, no matter how much lipstick one puts on a prostitute she is still a prostitute and is still for sale.
Although Codrea’s observations and queries go straight to heart of the matter the most telling indictment of AU is its own selective adherence to its stated purpose and its oft selective non-adherence to it.
AU cannot buy enough lipstick to change its character or those of its members.
You could be the recipient of respect if you followed your own charter, maybe not agreement, but at least respect as honest men with an honest difference of opinion. As it is no decent individual, you know those of which I speak, those with principles,could grant any respect to such hypocrites."
Post a Comment