"Under the administration's amicus brief, a national ban on all firearms – including hunting rifles – could be 'constitutional,' even if the Supreme Court decides – on ample historical evidence – that the Founders intended the Second Amendment as an individual right," he continued.Gun Owners of America and Heller's Robert Levy tell it like it is concerning the "Vote Freedom First President's" recent betrayal.
I'd originally written "latest betrayal," but realized that's not true.
3 comments:
But Pratt said it would be analogous to the situation in the state of Illinois, where the state constitution provides a right to keep and bear arms, "subject to the police power," he said.
Damn it! Pratt stole my idea (before I even mentioned it to anyone--he's a cunning one). I was going to make that point.
Make it and keep making it.
It's not exactly like such ideas are over-exposed...
I bet it won't be long before we see castigation of Pratt by our self anointed intellectual betters who claim to be on our side. Any bets?
Post a Comment