Lawyers for Mayor Bloomberg are asking a judge to ban any reference to the Second Amendment during the upcoming trial of a gun shop owner who was sued by the city.
Of course they are.
And the miserable black-robed subversive will probably agree with them. Just like the miserable black-robed subversive did in the Fincher case.
When you can ban any part of the Bill of Rights, books* and freedom of expression can't be far behind.
When it's clear that our oppressors are neo-Stalinists, the conviction to remain armed in spite of any human dignity-hating edict they pass becomes obvious.
[Via Jeffersonian and * John R ]
4 comments:
Can an attorney explain to me why this Georgia gun store owner has to appear in a New York City courtroom, in front of Judge Jack Never-Met-A-Gun-Ban-I-Didn't-Like Weinstein?
What does "jurisdiction" mean in this case, and why is a Georgia store owner under jurisdiction of a Brooklyn court? What would happen if the Georgia owner ignored New York City, or told them to take a flying @#&%! at a rolling doughnut?
Far behind? Like maybe 90 years ago? Well, I never claimed to be well-educated in history, and I'm now reading "Liberal Fascism". What an eye openner. Maybe next I'll read David Bernstein's You Can't Say That.
We're goin' to hell in a bucket, and it's not an enjoyable ride.
The name of the miserable black robed subversive traitor in the Fincher case is Jimm Larry Hendren.
Let us not forget his name. We should recall it in conjunction with the likes of Benedict Arnold.
The protests post-Sean-Bell-killers
acquittal weren't without merit,but
ppl should be here on the 27th. All
those following MSM-recognized "black leaders" (or any
color "leaders") should also start
thinking hard about where they are
being "led" cycjec
Post a Comment