This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
The Brits should ban the wearing of clothing in public. Naked people will be a lot easier to identify. With no pockets the concealed carry of any type weapon would be extremely difficult.
I hope US Homeland security goons don't read your blog as I may be giving them ideas.
Imagine flying naked, riding trains and buses naked, crossing state lines and into Canada or Mexico naked. disrobing before being allowed to enter courtrooms, post offices, city halls - it boggles the mind. But, it's no more inane than most of their other regulations.
Oh, come now. I'm sure that the statist bubbleheads who lobbied for the creation of the spy state considered all the possible consequences to liberty.
See, now the police (state) can just assume that anyone wearing a hat is a criminal, just like anyone who drops something into a clear liquid. The statist's plan is so easy and foolproof, it's almost like it was devised by a four-year-old with emotional problems, and no practical experience with society.
"Oy, an' no long 'air, either, mate. 'Angs daown in tha face obscurin' oidenitties, loike. Yul Brynner, Sinead O'Connor'll be hinspirations to us oll."
I now have an even better reason to wear my hat at all times and to refuse to take it off indoors. That's a silly modern notion anyway whose time has come and gone. Privacy trumps "politeness" in a police state.
5 comments:
The Brits should ban the wearing of clothing in public. Naked people will be a lot easier to identify. With no pockets the concealed carry of any type weapon would be extremely difficult.
I hope US Homeland security goons don't read your blog as I may be giving them ideas.
Imagine flying naked, riding trains and buses naked, crossing state lines and into Canada or Mexico naked. disrobing before being allowed to enter courtrooms, post offices, city halls - it boggles the mind. But, it's no more inane than most of their other regulations.
Sorry, WWW: As I've shown based on site visit logs, DoJ and SS, and various other alphabet agencies, are WoG regulars.
If there's a list, I'm on it.
Oh, come now. I'm sure that the statist bubbleheads who lobbied for the creation of the spy state considered all the possible consequences to liberty.
See, now the police (state) can just assume that anyone wearing a hat is a criminal, just like anyone who drops something into a clear liquid. The statist's plan is so easy and foolproof, it's almost like it was devised by a four-year-old with emotional problems, and no practical experience with society.
"Oy, an' no long 'air, either, mate. 'Angs daown in tha face obscurin' oidenitties, loike. Yul Brynner, Sinead O'Connor'll be hinspirations to us oll."
I now have an even better reason to wear my hat at all times and to refuse to take it off indoors. That's a silly modern notion anyway whose time has come and gone. Privacy trumps "politeness" in a police state.
Post a Comment