A "B-list topic"?You know, our unalienable right to keep and bear arms.
...A "sideshow issue"? [More]
Here's what the media cheerleaders think of our objection to the holder confirmation, today's Gun Rights Examiner column.
Please share the link wherever you can.
4 comments:
The media are big on DIVERSITY. In hiring, in planning coverage. Diversity of language, national origin, skin tone, gender, every kind but the POLITICAL kind. That may be why some news anchors on the job for 25 years are being laid off, major papers are going to 3 editions a week, and the Gannett media empire is forcing employees to take aweek off without pay.
Because the media think most Americans are socialist-leaning mouth-breathers.
But then, few media headquarters are located outside the cities. The NICE part of the cities. Main Street, Wall Street-type areas. $2,000 suits and $500 shoes. That's not America.
"...decidedly B-List topics..."
How wrong you are, Andrew Cohen. With you "Authorized Journalists" emceeing the rigged game, the right to keep and bear arms may even go right past being the A-List topic that it currently is, and become the A-RING topic we would really rather avoid--but that the disarmers seem utterly insistent upon.
You do realize, don't you, Cohen, that useful idiots are dispatched after serving their purpose, right? Serve your master as you see fit, but don't act surprised when he turns on you too. You have had fair warning, and you couldn't be bothered.
I only wish there was a way...
I only wish there was a way to get some of these guys - the "Authorized Journalists" - into target shooting. Think CMP high power and service rifle with AR-15s and M1 Garands.
I bet we'd see a difference in reporting if it were their interests that were attacked.
Sorry, should have been a different name.
Post a Comment