This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
I find it interesting that the article mentions Utah's pre-emption laws for public universities. Liberty University is a PRIVATE, faith-centered university founded by Jerry Falwell. Even if the Commonwealth of Virginia enacted a pre-emption law regarding public universities, it would not affect Liberty.
It appears that facts and context are no longer considered relevant to mainstream journalism any longer.
I must have missed something. What does the Utah law have to do with Virginia anyway?
A private enterprise has, and must continue to have every right to make this determination for itself. Those who do not like their rules do not have to be there.
We can certainly disagree with this school, and protest their decision, but any effort to force them to abide by our wishes will diminish the rights of everyone on their own property.
We must each vote with our feet and our wallets. Do not go to places that prohibit your defensive tool, and don't send your children to them either.
If everyone who cared about their rights would do that, I suspect the problem would shortly be solved. And then again.... maybe not. But we'd have a lot more solid ground on which to stand.
Private university with its own police force and a declaration from the trustees that the campus is gun free and therefore safe. On the record, documented, perfect. If they ever, God forbid, have an incident then they are wide open for a massive lawsuit. And should a permit holder be wounded or killed while on campus having disarmed to comply with their rule, they or their family might easily wind up owning the place.
Sorry, Uncle Lar, but they won't end up owning the place. Their attendance will be presented as voluntary, which it will be, and their adherence to the helpless victim policy will also be presented as a voluntary decision solely at their discretion and therefore the university is not responsible for that decision.
Hate to say this, but I would tend to agree.
As a practical matter the private police force will also be recognized as having qualified immunity as regards protecting any individual or not even attempting to do so. With that I disagree, but that is the way it is. Others can demand you be helpless for security, claim they have control of your safety then deny any responsibility for it when they fail to provide that security.
Known as having your cake and eating it too.
Helplessness is not a security measure. Enrollment at LU is not mandatory, in my world it isn't even desirable. Or any other university with the possible exception of those in Utah.
Parents who love their children properly would just refuse to send their children to "victim pool colleges". One year of that would change the policy everywhere. Think about that, if enrollment next year for first time freshmen was only 10% of this year's enrollment, the religion of disarmament at bastions of higher education would die almost instantly. They may not love your children enough to allow them defense of life, but they love your money enough to do what it takes to get it.
And a year in the real world working just might innoculate your children against further programming by the people who spread the propaganda that "armed is evil"./
Quote - [So the decision was made, since crime has not really been a problem at LU, not to make any changes to the policy at this time.”]
This statement may be readily translated: "Enough people haven't been raped, assaulted, robbed, or killed on campus yet to merit a change in university policy."
Well, Jerry Falwell can do what he wants, but his school is not a church and not Scripturally sanctioned. In the chapel on the campus I could understand, but not the campus as a whole.
Remember, the Marxists like Lenin were correct when they said that religion is the opiate pf the people. Trust in Jesus to watch over his flock. If something bad happens, then it in is God's will.
B*** S***, folks. Take some responsibilty for your lives and demand change. If the student body, en masse, led a torchlight procession to the university office (apologies to fans of "Frankensten", the movie) and demanded change, then change might occur. In the meanntime, everyone feels safe, fat (in the Biblical sense, remember, this is L.U.) and happy. Trust in Jesus. Amen.
8 comments:
David,
I find it interesting that the article mentions Utah's pre-emption laws for public universities. Liberty University is a PRIVATE, faith-centered university founded by Jerry Falwell. Even if the Commonwealth of Virginia enacted a pre-emption law regarding public universities, it would not affect Liberty.
It appears that facts and context are no longer considered relevant to mainstream journalism any longer.
Pax,
Newbius
I must have missed something. What does the Utah law have to do with Virginia anyway?
A private enterprise has, and must continue to have every right to make this determination for itself. Those who do not like their rules do not have to be there.
We can certainly disagree with this school, and protest their decision, but any effort to force them to abide by our wishes will diminish the rights of everyone on their own property.
We must each vote with our feet and our wallets. Do not go to places that prohibit your defensive tool, and don't send your children to them either.
If everyone who cared about their rights would do that, I suspect the problem would shortly be solved. And then again.... maybe not. But we'd have a lot more solid ground on which to stand.
Private university with its own police force and a declaration from the trustees that the campus is gun free and therefore safe. On the record, documented, perfect.
If they ever, God forbid, have an incident then they are wide open for a massive lawsuit. And should a permit holder be wounded or killed while on campus having disarmed to comply with their rule, they or their family might easily wind up owning the place.
Sorry, Uncle Lar, but they won't end up owning the place. Their attendance will be presented as voluntary, which it will be, and their adherence to the helpless victim policy will also be presented as a voluntary decision solely at their discretion and therefore the university is not responsible for that decision.
Hate to say this, but I would tend to agree.
As a practical matter the private police force will also be recognized as having qualified immunity as regards protecting any individual or not even attempting to do so. With that I disagree, but that is the way it is. Others can demand you be helpless for security, claim they have control of your safety then deny any responsibility for it when they fail to provide that security.
Known as having your cake and eating it too.
Helplessness is not a security measure. Enrollment at LU is not mandatory, in my world it isn't even desirable. Or any other university with the possible exception of those in Utah.
Parents who love their children properly would just refuse to send their children to "victim pool colleges". One year of that would change the policy everywhere. Think about that, if enrollment next year for first time freshmen was only 10% of this year's enrollment, the religion of disarmament at bastions of higher education would die almost instantly. They may not love your children enough to allow them defense of life, but they love your money enough to do what it takes to get it.
And a year in the real world working just might innoculate your children against further programming by the people who spread the propaganda that "armed is evil"./
Quote - [So the decision was made, since crime has not really been a problem at LU, not to make any changes to the policy at this time.”]
This statement may be readily translated: "Enough people haven't been raped, assaulted, robbed, or killed on campus yet to merit a change in university policy."
Just how many dead students is enough?
Well, Jerry Falwell can do what he wants, but his school is not a church and not Scripturally sanctioned. In the chapel on the campus I could understand, but not the campus as a whole.
Remember, the Marxists like Lenin were correct when they said that religion is the opiate pf the people. Trust in Jesus to watch over his flock. If something bad happens, then it in is God's will.
B*** S***, folks. Take some responsibilty for your lives and demand change. If the student body, en masse, led a torchlight procession to the university office (apologies to fans of "Frankensten", the movie) and demanded change, then change might occur. In the meanntime, everyone feels safe, fat (in the Biblical sense, remember, this is L.U.) and happy. Trust in Jesus. Amen.
Post a Comment