Thursday, October 15, 2009

The Morally Disabled on Property Rights

Officials with the Second Amendment Foundation have said the rule is illegal and planned to sue the city once the law went into effect. But Nickels doesn't believe the city is acting beyond its power, saying he is asserting the same rights private property owners have. [More]
What do they say? Possession is nine-tenths of the law?

Why would we expect a career kleptocrat to recognize the distinction between property and plunder?

Or recognize rights?

There's just no reasoning with moral retards.

[Via Bruce W. Krafft]

3 comments:

Carl said...

"When you sit down to negotiate on what you already have, you lose." ~~ Rep. Marie Parente
"The essential characteristic of socialism is the denial of individual property rights..." -- Ayn Rand
I have not the eloquence to add to these truths.

jon said...

collectivists asserting what is "public" is actually theirs, and "we" no longer includes you. nothing new here.

Kent McManigal said...

Governments possess nothing they did not steal. Thieves have no say in how the stolen property is used.