He said that he was pro-gun but still insisted that I need to take the holster off. [More]With friends like that...but I guess he must be--he didn't taze, club or shoot her.
I would never particpate in an "empty holster protest." Still, setting my bias aside, what an example of "Only One" elitism--as well as the apologist mentality of some (witness "hunter and NRA member RDW, who feels even this is going "too far.")
A pet peeve: Get and post the names of the harassers.
[Via Mama Liberty]
3 comments:
Our brave, stalwart, professional LEOs! I wonder what crimes were being committed while he was harrassing the law-abiding. Funny thing about these lard-buckets, they're supposed to enforce the law, but they don't seem to actually know anything about it.
Good thing he was "pro-gun" and working in her best interests... because according to him, she "would be detained and possibly arrested or shot".
As to be expected... this is about respecting his "authority".
He clearly deserved no respect.
Tony
[quote]
they're supposed to enforce the law, but they don't seem to actually know anything about it.
[/quote]
Enforce the law? Which law is that?
Each individual must enforce the law - the only one that means anything: the law of non-aggression. We do that all the time, actually, though few think of it that way.
We enforce it by living it out in our actions, and by our willingness/ability to defend ourselves from those who don't.
Can we delegate that to anyone else?
Post a Comment