Tennessee State Guard commander Richard Hamblen said it's his Second Amendment right as part of a militia to convert assault rifles into fully automatic weapons. The Sixth US Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed. [More]Because "shall not be infringed" is such a squishy and undefined concept...
Per Hamblen in his email to me:
...Point of clarification: ...I did not convert any guns from semiauto--all mine were remanufactured from de-milled machine gun kits. They always were machine guns, always were intended to be machine guns, and were nothing but machine guns, the "standard issue weapon", as Solicitor General Clement said in Heller, of the National Guard.If you haven't been following this case, here's what I've got.
The whole point is the constitutionality of the NFA of 1934 and therefore all gun laws. The Supreme Court ruled on what is protected by the Second Amendment in Miller in 1939. All I ask is that they honor their ruling and apply it to the law. And if that ruling is no longer correct, then they need to explain, with constitutional citations, why it is no longer correct.
3 comments:
I'd not heard about any sort of call to action for this fellow, who, at least in the plain English description of the case, is dead right against laws which are dead wrong (unconstitutional).
As he's already been kidnapped, caged, and let go by the so-called authorities, I'll certainly be adding his story to the litany of injustice which includes those of Wayne Fincher and David Olofson.
What does Mr. Hamblen need (or want)?
all the prags are busy on their blogs calling him a kook
anon, prags always do that. It mollifies their inferiority complex.
Wait, is it really a complex if they really are just inferior?
Post a Comment