This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
my comment at the site: The real problem here is that almost everybody, the author included, support denying some people their second amendment rights. True, the reasons vary. But as David Codrea says, "If someone can't be trusted with a gun, they can't be trusted without a keeper." So, either give every misdemeanant and felon life sentences and keep them in jail until they die or restore their citizenship to full status once their time is served. Uh huh, some of them will still be bad people. But good people who are armed can soon clean up that pool.
straightarrow, you nailed it perfectly. Government does not have the authority to control, regulate, or deny anyone the opportunity to carry a firearm outside of the prison bars.
“Adam Henderson shops for a rifle at Guns and Leather… “Adam would have better luck finding a rifle if he were to check out the rifle display.
I didn’t read anything in Mr. Denny’s article that indicates he supports the denial of the right to keep and bear arms or has any argument with the illegality of DUI or possession of marijuana. I believe he is merely pointing out that, because of anti-2nd Amendment lawmakers managing to obtain passage of feel good, knee jerk legislation, they have imposed unconstitutional “reasonable” regulations denying by “due process” the very right the 2nd Amendment was ratified to protect.
In addendum:
Mr. Denny did make his point that there are state and federal laws (ie Laughtenberg) that have circumvented the 2nd Amendment, and have in his words, “Back doored” the Constitution. Unfortunately the SCOTUS has ruled that these laws are reasonable, aren’t ex-post facto laws, and are merely “administrative sanctions” and not “punitive measures” against gun owners. The government will do anything it damn well pleases in attempts to control us, and as long as agents of government are allowed to coerce defendants into pleading guilty and/or no contest to any charge, misdemeanor or felony, those defendants will many times unknowingly forfeit their rights through ignorance.
3 comments:
my comment at the site: The real problem here is that almost everybody, the author included, support denying some people their second amendment rights. True, the reasons vary. But as David Codrea says, "If someone can't be trusted with a gun, they can't be trusted without a keeper." So, either give every misdemeanant and felon life sentences and keep them in jail until they die or restore their citizenship to full status once their time is served. Uh huh, some of them will still be bad people. But good people who are armed can soon clean up that pool.
Anything else is still an exercise in hypocrisy
straightarrow, you nailed it perfectly. Government does not have the authority to control, regulate, or deny anyone the opportunity to carry a firearm outside of the prison bars.
My comment on the site:
AP Caption under AP photo:
“Adam Henderson shops for a rifle at Guns and Leather… “Adam would have better luck finding a rifle if he were to check out the rifle display.
I didn’t read anything in Mr. Denny’s article that indicates he supports the denial of the right to keep and bear arms or has any argument with the illegality of DUI or possession of marijuana. I believe he is merely pointing out that, because of anti-2nd Amendment lawmakers managing to obtain passage of feel good, knee jerk legislation, they have imposed unconstitutional “reasonable” regulations denying by “due process” the very right the 2nd Amendment was ratified to protect.
In addendum:
Mr. Denny did make his point that there are state and federal laws (ie Laughtenberg) that have circumvented the 2nd Amendment, and have in his words, “Back doored” the Constitution. Unfortunately the SCOTUS has ruled that these laws are reasonable, aren’t ex-post facto laws, and are merely “administrative sanctions” and not “punitive measures” against gun owners. The government will do anything it damn well pleases in attempts to control us, and as long as agents of government are allowed to coerce defendants into pleading guilty and/or no contest to any charge, misdemeanor or felony, those defendants will many times unknowingly forfeit their rights through ignorance.
Post a Comment