This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
Of course they do. And if you are using windows or any other microsoft program, they probably already do.
Investigate Linux operating systems and programs. They are not nearly as vulnerable to the "back doors," and they are easy to use.
Learn about encryption and use that too.
If this old lady can do it, so can you. :)
Want to go even farther in this? Look at Boston T. Party's new book. One Nation Under Surveillance —Privacy from the Watchful Eye javelinpress.com/one-nation.html
There should be a high price for such power and I think I know what it should be. Everytime an agency of the government gets into private internet communications under a set-up as proposed the head of the agency is then executed and a new head appointed.
Enshrine that in law. Automatic execution for the directors. If they are truly patriotic and want only to do what is best for public safety and enforcement of the law the pure of heart will be willing. The others, not so much. If that could be made into law I say let them do it. And under no other circumstances. Ehe execution of the agency head to be carried out before any access is obtained can be used then by his successor. This requirement should be part of the application process, much like giving up your fingerprints for a CCW license. No execution, no access. Simple, effective and guaranteed to be used little.
Whoops, there goes that freedom of speech and association thing. Soviet bloc countries tolerated this kind of thing for decades. But not all of us are socialists, here.
4 comments:
Of course they do. And if you are using windows or any other microsoft program, they probably already do.
Investigate Linux operating systems and programs. They are not nearly as vulnerable to the "back doors," and they are easy to use.
Learn about encryption and use that too.
If this old lady can do it, so can you. :)
Want to go even farther in this? Look at Boston T. Party's new book. One Nation Under Surveillance —Privacy from the Watchful Eye
javelinpress.com/one-nation.html
There should be a high price for such power and I think I know what it should be. Everytime an agency of the government gets into private internet communications under a set-up as proposed the head of the agency is then executed and a new head appointed.
Enshrine that in law. Automatic execution for the directors. If they are truly patriotic and want only to do what is best for public safety and enforcement of the law the pure of heart will be willing. The others, not so much. If that could be made into law I say let them do it. And under no other circumstances. Ehe execution of the agency head to be carried out before any access is obtained can be used then by his successor. This requirement should be part of the application process, much like giving up your fingerprints for a CCW license. No execution, no access. Simple, effective and guaranteed to be used little.
50 Free Internet Tools for Tin-Foil Hat Wearers
Practical internet privacy
Whoops, there goes that freedom of speech and association thing.
Soviet bloc countries tolerated this kind of thing for decades.
But not all of us are socialists, here.
Post a Comment