This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
"the change would have no effect on benefits in 2010 and retirees would keep receiving their checks as usual."
which will be worth 10% less, or worse, every successive year.
"the first step of a long, slow march to insolvency, unless Congress strengthens the program’s finances."
it's insolvent now. everything but the general fund holds non-marketable IOUs. they cannot be redeemed right now. that is insolvency. what it is on its way to is default, where they try to redeem non-marketable securities and find... there's no market for it. surprise! they are talking about "cash flow insolvency," which is an accounting fiction. it means you can't pay down your debt as it comes due. but the cash paid out of the "trust fund" comes from the general fund. the intragovernmental IOU is "redeemed" to get it there.
imagine you start a bank account in a safe in your closet by writing down on a balance sheet that you owe your wallet a $10 bill. that is what a non-marketable IOU is. that is what intragovernment debt is. you take $20 from the ATM, put $10 in your wallet, spend $10, and then cut an IOU for $10 more. you start paying $1 back to your wallet every month... where's it coming from? taxation or the printing press.
what do you mean you don't have a printing press? what do you mean it's illegal for you to take money from someone else with the threat of force?
well, just give your friends a tenth of that balance sheet. write "worth $1" on it. you're good for it, right? see? $10 right here in your wallet. any time you want it, come ask for it.
...what do you mean those scraps of paper are non-marketable?
congress cannot do anything about this. because of term limits, nobody will be around when their short-term-relief decisions bring the long-term-pain, so nobody takes the pain. the fed papers it over and then gives themselves a raise to maintain their purchasing power against the new money supply. "suckers!"
if a massive depression doesn't hit soon, the hole just gets deeper. eventually, the military goes insolvent. will our sons and daughters still be in afpak, out of gas, holding worthless USD, looking for a ride home?
2 comments:
Gotta love Firesign references!
Don't forget Teslacle's Deviant to Fudd's Law: "It goes in, it must come out."
Seems even more fitting.
"the change would have no effect on benefits in 2010 and retirees would keep receiving their checks as usual."
which will be worth 10% less, or worse, every successive year.
"the first step of a long, slow march to insolvency, unless Congress strengthens the program’s finances."
it's insolvent now. everything but the general fund holds non-marketable IOUs. they cannot be redeemed right now. that is insolvency. what it is on its way to is default, where they try to redeem non-marketable securities and find... there's no market for it. surprise! they are talking about "cash flow insolvency," which is an accounting fiction. it means you can't pay down your debt as it comes due. but the cash paid out of the "trust fund" comes from the general fund. the intragovernmental IOU is "redeemed" to get it there.
imagine you start a bank account in a safe in your closet by writing down on a balance sheet that you owe your wallet a $10 bill. that is what a non-marketable IOU is. that is what intragovernment debt is. you take $20 from the ATM, put $10 in your wallet, spend $10, and then cut an IOU for $10 more. you start paying $1 back to your wallet every month... where's it coming from? taxation or the printing press.
what do you mean you don't have a printing press? what do you mean it's illegal for you to take money from someone else with the threat of force?
well, just give your friends a tenth of that balance sheet. write "worth $1" on it. you're good for it, right? see? $10 right here in your wallet. any time you want it, come ask for it.
...what do you mean those scraps of paper are non-marketable?
congress cannot do anything about this. because of term limits, nobody will be around when their short-term-relief decisions bring the long-term-pain, so nobody takes the pain. the fed papers it over and then gives themselves a raise to maintain their purchasing power against the new money supply. "suckers!"
if a massive depression doesn't hit soon, the hole just gets deeper. eventually, the military goes insolvent. will our sons and daughters still be in afpak, out of gas, holding worthless USD, looking for a ride home?
long walk.
Post a Comment