See, this is the kind of unrealistic expectation that happens when someone unsophisticated and unschooled in the law—like me—intrudes into the mystic arts with quaint, simplistic notions. [More]I figured a picture was worth a few words about a conspicuous absence...so I put out a second Gun Rights Examiner column today.
Share the link?
2 comments:
I read the transcript. I understand that the arguments were already filed in the briefs, and this hearing was for summation and clarification of issues to be raised by the justices. Call me naive, but I was amazed at how many times the attorneys were interrupted mid-sentence by the justices asking a question. Sometimes the attorneys were only able to a utter a single word. Is there any other word for this behavior other than "rude"?
I'm mad they didn't argue "nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
No law can exempt police or politicians. The right of the police to carry concealed handguns is protected. I want equal protection.
Post a Comment