A common complaint is media bias and absence of representation for "our side."
These people work hard to change that and ask for nothing from those of us their labors serve other than to help spread the word. I hope no one thinks that's too much to ask.
Here are their latest offerings:
Dan Bidstrup/Denver:
Attending the Denver Tea Party
Kurt Hofmann/St. Louis:
Is Congress trying to put the President and other dignitaries at risk?
Go. Read. And please share these links.
You're doing that, right?
Go. Read. And please share these links.
You're doing that, right?
1 comment:
I'm confused. Let's see if I can explain why.
As I understand it (in broad brush terms):
1. A bill was created to give DC Congressional representation.
2. An amendment (the Ensign amendment) was proposed to add striking down DC gun laws to the bill.
3. The bill was dropped because of the "poison pill" of the gun laws amendment.
WTF???
The NSD (National Socialist Democrats) have a majority in the house.
Why would enough of them support the amendment for it to be included in the bill, but then be expected to vote against the bill as amended, resulting in it being dropped?
Post a Comment