This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
Kratman's article is excellent, and thank you for directing me to him. His writing comports with and supports some of my own ideas.
Most especially, I view the First and Second Amendments, not as the reservation of rights, but as the enumeration of powers to a Fourth Branch of the government, that is, We the People. I'm putting this forward not as a legal argument, but as a way of for us to think about our role, that is, as sovereigns, not subjects.
"When you consider the First and Second Amendments in this way, attempts by the government to limit or infringe those rights are exposed as attempts of one branch of government to usurp the powers of another. It is as if during the State of the Union address, soldiers equipped with riot gear and rifles stationed themselves around the chamber, while the President announced a list of bills he wanted passed…."
This was posted over at the GunBurger piece, so I deleted it from there:
Ahab has left a new comment on your post "Welcome to Gun Burger, May I Take Your Order...?":
This is the best piece I've read on the ramifications of those first six amendments of the Bill of Rights, specifically the First and Second Amendments I've read in recent memory. Tom Kratman has defined the issue as no other has in almost forever.
Too bad only people that read pieces in "The War On Guns," and over at "Sipsey Street Irregulars" will get to see it. The whole of the population needs to read this and think about everything presented. No other issue in modern times, not since the issue of slavery, has the potential to bring this nation to civil war if the federal government attempts to make defunct the Second Amendment.
Mr Kratman is absolutely correct. As long as there is a First Amendment the exercise of which keeps everyone informed of what's going on in and around our government, then "we the people" will and can retain the right with the Second Amendment to overthrow a tyrannical and oppressive government.
4 comments:
Kratman is one of my favorite current writers. From context you can tell that this is a somewhat older piece, but still relevant.
Kratman's article is excellent, and thank you for directing me to him. His writing comports with and supports some of my own ideas.
Most especially, I view the First and Second Amendments, not as the reservation of rights, but as the enumeration of powers to a Fourth Branch of the government, that is, We the People. I'm putting this forward not as a legal argument, but as a way of for us to think about our role, that is, as sovereigns, not subjects.
"When you consider the First and Second Amendments in this way, attempts by the government to limit or infringe those rights are exposed as attempts of one branch of government to usurp the powers of another. It is as if during the State of the Union address, soldiers equipped with riot gear and rifles stationed themselves around the chamber, while the President announced a list of bills he wanted passed…."
The man can throw some light around.
This was posted over at the GunBurger piece, so I deleted it from there:
Ahab has left a new comment on your post "Welcome to Gun Burger, May I Take Your Order...?":
This is the best piece I've read on the ramifications of those first six amendments of the Bill of Rights, specifically the First and Second Amendments I've read in recent memory. Tom Kratman has defined the issue as no other has in almost forever.
Too bad only people that read pieces in "The War On Guns," and over at "Sipsey Street Irregulars" will get to see it. The whole of the population needs to read this and think about everything presented. No other issue in modern times, not since the issue of slavery, has the potential to bring this nation to civil war if the federal government attempts to make defunct the Second Amendment.
Mr Kratman is absolutely correct. As long as there is a First Amendment the exercise of which keeps everyone informed of what's going on in and around our government, then "we the people" will and can retain the right with the Second Amendment to overthrow a tyrannical and oppressive government.
Post a Comment