But strictly as a health matter, getting rid of guns is a no-brainer. [More]Here's the Braniac who asserts that.
If we test his gun-free hypothesis and postulate altercations determined by physical prowess, what do you think his chances would be if a member of the endangered group he champions decided to spatter his brains all over the sidewalk?
6 comments:
The Brainiac essentially justified taking guns away from Hispanics and blacks in that article.
I dare say we're not going to do that, despite the Sullivan Laws where were intended to do just that.
Given where we're headed, the possibility of the group he champions splattering his brains all over the sidewalk, look rather good. But then, I'm always an optimist.
And, we all know that the statistic numbers are so much more important than anything else.
Brainiac indeed.
Mr. Haberman forgot the third factor. The 95% in the 18 to 34 year old age group he spoke of are most likely involved in drug trafficking or some other unlawful activity. The guns are mere "accessories" of their vocation and the violence is simply the "risk of doing business."
My goodness. Whadda maroon.
OOPS! Gotta run. I'm going to the local DNC meeting and need to unpack my machine gun.
Nice to know I'm one of the 26 percenters...
So this guy suggests that the large, strong and aggressive should rule everyone, basically. That's what he's saying, whether he realizes it or not.
Nancy Grace has a new show, "Swift Justice." A case today was of a mother with a special needs child, and her ex-husband who doesn't take the boy to therapy when he has visitation.
The little boy's "special needs" seem to be that he likes walloping the other kids and even the school principal. They're scared of him. He's 7. He's been diagnosed with ADHD and bipolar disorder. OK.
Maybe he's just a bully.
Daddy is finishing up five years of probation for having a personal amount of marijuana and a REGISTERED gun. Nancy isn't sure Mommy should have the boy exposed to "drugs and guns."
Well, she was a prosecutor.
Post a Comment