Thursday, September 09, 2010

Now There's a Man...

...who has mastered his Orwell!

Yeah, the Founders envisioned a disarmed Marxist Utopia!

Good one, Dennis!
Posted by David Codrea at 9/09/2010 01:10:00 PM

6 comments:

Sean said...

Next they'll proclaim liberty throughout the land.

9/09/2010 1:24 PM
Defender said...

I'd say they've already taken the Constitution back, to the detriment of everyone. The Interstate Commerce Clause was meant to keep trade among the independent original states who CHOSE to united fair and peaceful, NOT to give the central government the power to regulate goods and manipulate free market ideals. We are all felons in their eyes, we just haven't been caught yet.
Is it my imagination or is Dennis getting even more shrill than usual? Must be frightened at the tenor of the times.

9/09/2010 2:01 PM
Ned said...

Under the interstate commerce clause the feds can control food you grow in your back yard and consume at home. See, it has an effect on interstate commerce, in that you didn't have to purchase goods imported into your state.

I guess "progressives" believe that was the founder's intent.

There's gazillions of useful idiots out there in LaLa land...

9/09/2010 3:03 PM
Pat H. said...

Hennigan said it all when he announced his target audience was progressives, the American fascists.

Of course all fascists want a disarmed populace, they always have.

I did see that Hennigan claims to have won in Montana with regard to the Montana Firearms Freedom Act, but I can't seem to find any reference to that win anywhere but the Brady web site, and we know how prone that site is to the big lie.

I do foresee a clash between ATF thugs and the populace over firearms manufacture at some point, in some state. It's important, for future enhancements to FFA's already passed, and to add to those being considered, a mandate for state and county law enforcement to defend the local firearms maker against the federal invading henchmen. We must reorient state and local law enforcement.

9/09/2010 4:14 PM
W W Woodward said...

I read the comments down to where if I read one more I would have become ill enough to throw up on my keyboard.

Apparently, a large number of people who profess to know the framers' thinking, beliefs, and intents have never read the Constitution, the Federalist Papers or the Anti-Federalist Papers. And, that is unfortunate because all those documents were written in the plain understandable English of the time.

Anti-federalist expressed doubts and fears of tyranny while the federalists discounted those concerns with assurances that the newly formed government did not have the empowerment and would never have the strength or authority to overpower the sovereignty of We The People.

The 1st ten amendments were added in order to allay fears, in spite of the federalists' assurances, that there was nothing in the original body of the Constitution that could be interpreted in such a manner as to endanger the liberties of We The People.

There was never any intent to deviate from the original meaning of the word "regulate", at least until Father Abraham decided the "sanctity" of his and his party's power was more important than the liberties of We The People. It's been downhill every since.

[W3]

9/09/2010 4:24 PM
Crotalus said...

Progressives take BACK the Constitution? Uh huh. And black is white, ignorance is strength, and all that other happy horsepatootie.

Orwellian Newspeak indeed!

9/10/2010 1:23 AM

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)