This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
I recently met a PhD working as a receptionist. Driving past the local large university, I saw many earnest-looking young people obviously thinking those hundreds of hours and tens of thousands of dollars will get them something besides some nice calligraphy on parchment. Wakey-wakey time.
I'm sure it will be lost on all the statist apologist types that--regardless of the individual failings of this filing, which are obvious enough--this example is nothing more than responding in the same tone in which one has been addressed.
Frankly, I thought it was reasonably polite. History tells me pretty clearly that everything the state does involves the implicit threat of murder for "noncompliance", and so pretty much any appearance in a courtroom in legal opposition to the state involves at least one muzzle pointed at you.
See? "Cocksucker" seems almost flimsy in that context, doesn't it?
Amusing read. I wonder how many of those get filed that we never hear about? :-)
4 comments:
I recently met a PhD working as a receptionist. Driving past the local large university, I saw many earnest-looking young people obviously thinking those hundreds of hours and tens of thousands of dollars will get them something besides some nice calligraphy on parchment.
Wakey-wakey time.
I'm sure it will be lost on all the statist apologist types that--regardless of the individual failings of this filing, which are obvious enough--this example is nothing more than responding in the same tone in which one has been addressed.
Frankly, I thought it was reasonably polite. History tells me pretty clearly that everything the state does involves the implicit threat of murder for "noncompliance", and so pretty much any appearance in a courtroom in legal opposition to the state involves at least one muzzle pointed at you.
See? "Cocksucker" seems almost flimsy in that context, doesn't it?
Amusing read. I wonder how many of those get filed that we never hear about? :-)
I've gone paperless. They can consider themselves served.
If courts hadn't become so contemptible, we wouldn't have to hold them in contempt.
Post a Comment