This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
They hope for a peaceful transition as the infidel government resigns, but if a fight is necessary... If you worship other gods or none, the reason they cut off heads or hands is to "expiate your sins." It's a mercy, because without this cleansing, you are destined for eternal hellfire, even though Allah is "the merciful and compassionate." This Australian CONVERTED to Islam. I remember Supercans filled with surrendered Australians' guns for the steel furnace.
[The United States] will have advanced from a nation of aircraft carriers to a nation of debt carriers.
debt carrier, singular. (with a whole bunch of tax slaves behind it). one corporate entity which can default if the political will to do so is mustered. (in my opinion, it never will be).
the two possible consequences are default (dollar survives, but is widely repudiated after the fact) or hyperinflation (dollar "goes to zero", repudiation not necessary).
they are consequences and not choices; not even the fed is capable of directly, intentionally steering an entire nation one way or the other. they can certainly effect it, and they certainly have the greatest influence than any other, but this is not the same. there is no ultimate authority in control. choice and intention are not part of the equation.
the reason these two possibilities are it, and that there is no middle way, is that if there existed any middle way whatsoever, then it has no end; it could not be like a terminating algorithm you'd find on some online debt repayment/interest calculator.
think about it: you write down any middle-path plan you like, math or otherwise. then you show me how twenty generations are going to follow your words. last time we tried that we called it the u.s. constitution. any one part of that document working flawlessly? how about even the definitions of words in the constitution -- are they settled?
to the degree the middle path is gentle, it itself is never shunned by the public, in exchange for solvency. ergo, people become politicians to maintain the status quo indefinitely.
now the status quo is by definition what you have right here, right now. and what do we have? cash flow insolvency around the corner. debt ceiling being raised again. hundreds of trillions in unfunded liabilities -- that's things you've promised to pay in the future, that you have no forseeable future income to cover. this all hasn't changed since... well, who even knows for sure?
mises showed that there is no middle way between capitalism and socialism; the so-called middle ways are socialism. this insight applies most especially to finance.
"For Americans, the quickest way to understand modern Britain is to look at what lbj’s Great Society did to the black family and imagine it applied to the general population"
3 comments:
Very perceptive and insightful toward patterns.
ne way they are coming:
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/pm-go-and-let-the-muslims-take-over/story-e6frg6nf-1225991362018
They hope for a peaceful transition as the infidel government resigns, but if a fight is necessary...
If you worship other gods or none, the reason they cut off heads or hands is to "expiate your sins." It's a mercy, because without this cleansing, you are destined for eternal hellfire, even though Allah is "the merciful and compassionate."
This Australian CONVERTED to Islam.
I remember Supercans filled with surrendered Australians' guns for the steel furnace.
[The United States] will have advanced from a nation of aircraft carriers to a nation of debt carriers.
debt carrier, singular. (with a whole bunch of tax slaves behind it). one corporate entity which can default if the political will to do so is mustered. (in my opinion, it never will be).
the two possible consequences are default (dollar survives, but is widely repudiated after the fact) or hyperinflation (dollar "goes to zero", repudiation not necessary).
they are consequences and not choices; not even the fed is capable of directly, intentionally steering an entire nation one way or the other. they can certainly effect it, and they certainly have the greatest influence than any other, but this is not the same. there is no ultimate authority in control. choice and intention are not part of the equation.
the reason these two possibilities are it, and that there is no middle way, is that if there existed any middle way whatsoever, then it has no end; it could not be like a terminating algorithm you'd find on some online debt repayment/interest calculator.
think about it: you write down any middle-path plan you like, math or otherwise. then you show me how twenty generations are going to follow your words. last time we tried that we called it the u.s. constitution. any one part of that document working flawlessly? how about even the definitions of words in the constitution -- are they settled?
to the degree the middle path is gentle, it itself is never shunned by the public, in exchange for solvency. ergo, people become politicians to maintain the status quo indefinitely.
now the status quo is by definition what you have right here, right now. and what do we have? cash flow insolvency around the corner. debt ceiling being raised again. hundreds of trillions in unfunded liabilities -- that's things you've promised to pay in the future, that you have no forseeable future income to cover. this all hasn't changed since... well, who even knows for sure?
mises showed that there is no middle way between capitalism and socialism; the so-called middle ways are socialism. this insight applies most especially to finance.
Money quote:
"For Americans, the quickest way to understand modern Britain is to look at what lbj’s Great Society did to the black family and imagine it applied to the general population"
Post a Comment