Tuesday, August 02, 2011

If ATF can’t tell us what a ‘firearm’ is, who can?

It’s more than just chasing after a rumor, which would be easy to dismiss or just flat-out ignore. A friend of mine has given me a real-world example, and per the concern I expressed yesterday, it involves a completely different firearm and a completely different caliber—meaning precedent has already been established—years ago—to mess with millions of gun owners based entirely on mercurial and mutable agency inconsistencies in application of rules.[More]
Another Gun Rights Examiner column for today...make all the news that needs to be shared stop!  Shoot, it's after 4:00 pm and I haven't even started on my radio show research for tomorrow yet...

3 comments:

Kent McManigal said...

I don't need some brainless, ball-less, idiot bureaucrat or enforcer to tell me what a firearm is. And I don't "need" them to tell me whether or not I have their permission to own one either. "Shall NOT be infringed", MFers.

Carl "Bear" Bussjaeger said...

Akins stocks, Oloson's malf, shoelaces, airsoft toys...

I would say the gloryholing perverts at ATF consider _everything_ a machine gun until proven otherwise, except that they don't accept proofs to the contrary.

Anonymous said...

Since they say that a shoestring and rubber band is a machine gun, they can tell us anything, kill or imprison the "perpetrator", and get away with it.