Rachel Madcow knows the truth. She understands it. She just can't bring herself to override her collectivist predisposition and apply it. [Watch]
One gets the feeling her concerns are solely for those who might be "profiled" for jihadist tendencies, and do not extend to those of us who might sport the wrong bumper sticker expressing more "homegrown" sentiments.
Tuesday, December 13, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
From the article:
“You don’t need armor piercing bullets for hunting. Last time I saw a deer wearing a bullet proof vest was a long time ago,” [Bloomberg] said.
I seriously doubt the shooter was using "armor piercing bullets," and even if he had been, I also seriously doubt Officer Figoski was wearing armor over his face.
Um, Kurt? Wrong article for your comment, I think.
But Rachel does show a lot more understanding of the Constitution than I thought she did. She even brought up the 4A. Yet, she can't seem to wrap her head around the 2A. Why?
Um, Kurt? Wrong article for your comment, I think.
Yeah--I must have gotten switched into Doofus Mode again.
Post a Comment