At this early stage of the litigation, in the procedural posture of this case, it cannot be said conclusively whether “assault weapons” as defined by the ordinance fall within or outside the scope of the rights protected by the second amendment. [More]Sure it can. Just try saying it doesn't--on a national scale--and then enforcing it.
Thursday, April 05, 2012
That All Depends on the Meaning of the Word "Conclusively"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment