Had CBS 5 wished to discuss bullet buttons or any other fallout from California’s ridiculous and ineffective anti-gun edicts, there would have been no shortage of resources ready and willing to meet them face-to-face and provide their audience with informed guidance. The entire “undercover” rationale was unjustified from the beginning, designed to create the illusion that viewers were being provided a straight news exposé by hard-boiled reporters, instead of by mob-inciting “Authorized Journalist” hacks with plenty of agenda but not much in the way of respect for traditional ethics and canons of journalism. [More]Today's Gun Rights Examiner report follows up on a covert anti-gun activist operation posing as "news."
Thursday, May 03, 2012
CBS intentionally violated posted gun show rules in phony undercover stunt
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
California is an "informed consent state" but only when there is a "reasonable expectation of privacy". Unless the event was a "members only" type thing they were probably legally okay there. At best they could have been tresspassed if they had been caught violating the private prohibition on photography/filming.
Post a Comment