This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
I was fascinated by the artwork here, but I had to enlarge that poster to make out the bottom line of text. That is when I realized that the hammer was striking a left facing profiled head in back of a clock face.
"Byem po lzhyeoodarnikam"
So I want to the old "Russki-Angliski Slovar", otherwise known as the "Russian English Dictionary" to attempt to learn what the third word meant, as the first two words were easy - "We strike/beat for...". I even went online to determine what the word was. No luck, perhaps because it is a word out of modern usage, but many words that begin with "l" and "zh", sometimes with a vowel between them, refer to lies, perjury and deception, and those that spread them. Putting "l", "zh" and sometimes "ye" in front of a word may even mean "pseudo-". An "oodarnik" is a percussionist in the musical sense of the word or shock of striking power in the military sense. So would a proper translation be "We beat those who would beat a different drum"? Get in step, comrades.
I learned a new word from a suggested translation of the word - "sciolist":
"Sciolist - definition of Sciolist by the Free Online Dictionary ... www.thefreedictionary.com/Sciolistsci·o·lism (s -l z m). n. A pretentious attitude of scholarship; superficial knowledgeability. [From Late Latin sciolus, smatterer, diminutive of Latin scius, knowing, ..."
So, I did a little more burrowing on what an "udarnik" was. In the Soviet system, they were over-achievers - literally "shock workers", who substantially exceeded their quotas who were made famous for their efforts, sometimes at the cost of the quality of the work or with the unacknowledged support of their co-workers.
To use a modern English colloquialism, a "lzheoodarnik" is someone who "fakes it until he makes it", and the poster claims that "We kill those who fraudulently exceed their quotas". Motivating, isn't it?
2 comments:
I was fascinated by the artwork here, but I had to enlarge that poster to make out the bottom line of text. That is when I realized that the hammer was striking a left facing profiled head in back of a clock face.
"Byem po lzhyeoodarnikam"
So I want to the old "Russki-Angliski Slovar", otherwise known as the "Russian English Dictionary" to attempt to learn what the third word meant, as the first two words were easy - "We strike/beat for...". I even went online to determine what the word was. No luck, perhaps because it is a word out of modern usage, but many words that begin with "l" and "zh", sometimes with a vowel between them, refer to lies, perjury and deception, and those that spread them. Putting "l", "zh" and sometimes "ye" in front of a word may even mean "pseudo-". An "oodarnik" is a percussionist in the musical sense of the word or shock of striking power in the military sense. So would a proper translation be "We beat those who would beat a different drum"? Get in step, comrades.
I learned a new word from a suggested translation of the word - "sciolist":
"Sciolist - definition of Sciolist by the Free Online Dictionary ...
www.thefreedictionary.com/Sciolistsci·o·lism (s -l z m). n. A pretentious attitude of scholarship; superficial knowledgeability. [From Late Latin sciolus, smatterer, diminutive of Latin scius, knowing, ..."
Yes, indeed.
So, I did a little more burrowing on what an "udarnik" was. In the Soviet system, they were over-achievers - literally "shock workers", who substantially exceeded their quotas who were made famous for their efforts, sometimes at the cost of the quality of the work or with the unacknowledged support of their co-workers.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Udarnik
http://russiapedia.rt.com/of-russian-origin/udarnik/
To use a modern English colloquialism, a "lzheoodarnik" is someone who "fakes it until he makes it", and the poster claims that "We kill those who fraudulently exceed their quotas". Motivating, isn't it?
Post a Comment