But don’t protest a business — one, by the way, that is not hindering a person’s rights whatsoever — that is simply making a decision to give up market share to competitors on a particular kind of weapon. [More]Bull. It's abandoning their brothers-in-arms on the battlefield and leaving them to stand or fall while the cowardly profiteers who want the benefits without the rigors or risks slink away. It is emboldening the enemy.
Dick's and Quislings like them deserted us in time of need. Their competitors who did not collapse before we even engaged, but who have held fast and faithfully, and stand with us through the storm, are the ones who have earned our continued association.
3 comments:
David, couldn't help but notice that this screed was published by a Gannett newspaper - the very same outfit who thinks it's ok to unlawfully post names and addresses of gun permit holders.
As the war intensifies, it is imperative that we oppose not only the leftists, but also the "Cheaper Than Dick's" in our midst. I've contacted both via e-mail, BTW.
III N TN
Indeed, David. I boycotted S&W until they changed ownership and the executives responsible for the agreement with the Clinton admin were no longer with the company.
Many in the shooting community still haven't forgiven the company.
Agree. If those people don't want our gun business, they don't get our business on anything. Keep publicizing the quislings.
Post a Comment