Maybe we will also disagree about the fact that if the government decides to go door-to-door, you and your arms, no matter how powerful, stand no chance. [More]Not very imaginative, is this no-line-in-the-sand coward?
Funny-- as final as he makes it sound, he doesn't list any credentials to assure us his opinion in this matter is informed.
[Via Michael G]
3 comments:
"I will not, however, pretend it means or says something it does not — that it prohibits us from regulating or banning especially deadly firearms."
Some firearms kill people deader than others?
Apparently, this fellow from New York City thinks that "shall not be infringed" means the same thing as "shall be infringed". Just to set the record straight, those phrases have meanings that are opposite, not identical. Justice Scalia take note.
The Republican Party isn't the Tea Party, it's the "Low T" Party.
"...especially deadly firearms."
I think I heard about those guns. They're made by a company called "Afterlife Arms". They use a proprietary cartridge that has a bullet that's been blessed, or sanctified, or made holy somehow. The idea is that the gun will not only kill a bad guy, but it will also kill his ghost. They're said to be good for home defense while preventing hauntings.
Post a Comment