The Court agrees. "In general, one has no duty to control the conduct of another to prevent him from causing harm to a third party, but there are exceptions to this, based on "special relationships." [More]The antis keep wanting to have it both ways, with duties on citizens, like this, or to retreat when lives are being threatened, that the "Only Ones" are exempt from.
Funny. The Bradys don't seem to want to talk about their losses...
1 comment:
In Kansas, it can get you life in prison. They take food contamination seriously.
Post a Comment