Monday, December 23, 2013

BOHICA

The group, which McDevitt said includes a diversity of opinions, has met in private with advocates on both sides of the gun access debate, mental health practitioners and researchers, school officials and police chiefs from rural, suburban and urban areas. [More]
Really? They've met with someone from the "shall not be infringed" side? I must have missed that part.

Meanwhile, elsewhere in Burlington, they've "yielded results."

Sorry, fellas. The "Authorized Journalists" covered for this miserable failure as much as they could without becoming obvious laughingstocks themselves.

I guess there'll never be a need to go "through every Middlesex village and farm for the country folk to be up and to arm" anymore.  Besides, they're probably all at Wegman's.

3 comments:

Bear said...

It's Mass. To them "both sides" means they talked with folks who want total bans and with those who only want more regulation and limits. For now. Actual RKBA types don't count, which is why I know for a fact that smart gun owners are already moving their collections out of state while they prep to move themselves.

15 guns in a "buyback"... 'Round here, we call that "the closet".

Archer said...

Bear beat me to it: "Both sides" means "assault weapon" ban advocates and "universal background check" advocates.

Should we be thankful the "two sides" have found common ground?

Robert Fowler said...

"Campbell said the temporary nature of the designation would enable a doctor to list a soldier newly returned from combat and suffering from “pronounced” symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder without the designation permanently excluding the soldier from firearm ownership."

BULL. Once The VA gets wind of it, they will be entered into the NICS system and lose their 2A rights forever.