Wednesday, November 12, 2014

How Much More Proof Do You Need?

As a follow-up to this post, don't take my word for it that Obamacare is "anti-gun" regardless of any "fixes" we've been told neutralize bad provisions and make it palatable from a "single issue" standpoint. In this case, I'm going to ask you to place your trust in the White House and accept that this time, they're not lying:
[Click to enlarge]
Obfuscation, misdirection and leaping to illusions (including, admittedly by some in "conservative" media) notwithstanding, don't let Media Matters' (the unofficial PR firm for the Obama administration) incomplete parsing of technicalities lull you into complacency. There are still plenty of pitfalls #16 opens the trap door to, particularly when you consider who built the trap.

I'll be adding more pieces to the picture in the near future.

2 comments:

MamaLiberty said...

A doctor can "ask" any question, just like anybody else. Nobody has to answer them.

Obammacare is toxic and destructive to freedom in so many ways, reaching far beyond any one issue. And the only rational answer is for people to take personal responsibility for their lives and stop looking to politicians and bureaucrats for anything.

If you don't/can't trust your doctor... just why would you be talking to them at all?

Ned said...

I had the same initial thought, MamaL. The problem is, we have all experienced how regulatory schemes mutate towards power added to the state, at the expense of natural rights.

I can easily envision a scheme wherein someone who requires medical intervention for a debilitating disease, is forced by regulatory scheme to disclose whether or not he or she owns guns.

Whether or not the person lies, the fact can be determined due to state and federal unlawful collection of 4473 information.

It's the camel's nose under the tent.

Besides, under ObolaCare, a person doesn't necessarily have a right to choose a doctor. A real problem if one actually requires treatment.