Responding to the application, Oceanport’s chief of police, Daniel W. Barcus, contended that Russell had failed to demonstrate “justifiable need”: “There are no specific threats or previous attacks on you,” Barcus wrote, and neither is there any “special danger to your life that cannot be avoided by means other than by issuance of a permit to carry a handgun.” The answer to the question was “no.” [More]How can you tell when Daniel W. Barcus is lying? Click here for answer!
[Via Michael G]
1 comment:
Maybe he forgot to say "Pretty please with sugar and sprinkles on it!?!?!?".
Post a Comment