Tuesday, February 28, 2017

His Record Speaks for Itself!

Headline: 2012 case highlights Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch's 'pro-gun' record [More]
Well then I guess we don't need to ask any pesky questions and can just assume.

Or examine any pesky competing affiliations.

After all, with Republicans behind him, with all those sterling "conservative" testimonials, and with all those "pro-gun" assurances, how can we lose?

What? Limited sampling and cherry-picking doesn't always work?


2 comments:

Crotalus said...

The sad thing is, David, I don't think we can find a justice who will adhere to the Bill of Rights. Gorsuch was touted as an originalist, but then he said that bit about shall not be infringed lightly, to which I gave the stink-eye.

SCOTUS usurped the power (not authority) to "interpret" (read: reinvent) back in Jefferson's day, IIRC, and therefore, not a justice in the land will adhere to the Constitution, but only to his "interpretation" of it.

Anonymous said...

Marbury vs Madison still stinks to this day