Well then I guess we don't need to ask any pesky questions and can just assume.Headline: 2012 case highlights Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch's 'pro-gun' record [More]
Or examine any pesky competing affiliations.
After all, with Republicans behind him, with all those sterling "conservative" testimonials, and with all those "pro-gun" assurances, how can we lose?
What? Limited sampling and cherry-picking doesn't always work?
2 comments:
The sad thing is, David, I don't think we can find a justice who will adhere to the Bill of Rights. Gorsuch was touted as an originalist, but then he said that bit about shall not be infringed lightly, to which I gave the stink-eye.
SCOTUS usurped the power (not authority) to "interpret" (read: reinvent) back in Jefferson's day, IIRC, and therefore, not a justice in the land will adhere to the Constitution, but only to his "interpretation" of it.
Marbury vs Madison still stinks to this day
Post a Comment