Friday, November 10, 2017

It's Not the Size of the Cadre in the Fight



"Tangled web" notwithstanding...

Posted by David Codrea at 11/10/2017 01:33:00 PM

5 comments:

Henry said...

Overly elliptical posting… are we to understand from the historical reference that YOU were the party awarded the proceeds from this penalty?

11/10/2017 8:00 PM
David Codrea said...

Yeah, I guess it's obscure. It's David Hardy. The order isn't online, so I linked to my past post on this case. I was part of the "cadre" and "tangled web" the govt lawyer was trying to reference to get out of paying atty fees.

11/10/2017 11:21 PM
MamaLiberty said...

$4,809.35 - Fees on fees... I guess that has to count as refreshingly honest in such things. But I'd like to see an itemized bill here. Something's fishy. :)

11/11/2017 8:42 AM
David Codrea said...

Was unfamiliar with the term so I looked it up and found this to help understand the concept. In re the award, plaintiff's motion was "GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; specifically, the plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED to the extent it seeks attorneys’ fees and costs from the Department of Justice Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) and DENIED to the extent it seeks attorneys’ fees and costs from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives..."

11/11/2017 11:20 AM
Anonymous said...

Not bad at all!!!!

11/11/2017 12:52 PM

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)