Monday, February 19, 2018

As Simple as a Swab Test?


[More]
Well I'm totally out of my depth on this one. I'm looking at the intrusiveness aspect, and aside from not seeing any clear fedgov authority to involve itself in this area, I'd think this would be something medical practice and pharmaceutical company insurers would want to require as a matter of liability protection.

Anybody have a clue about the contraindication assumptions?

And of course, due process protections would need to apply.

2 comments:

MamaLiberty said...

The medical people don't really know how these foreign chemicals affect the human body/mind to start with, so I don't have any real faith in some "test" that proposes to differentiate. The real problem is the insane idea that everything, every problem and every anxiety has a chemical/pill answer.

And no, the non-voluntary government certainly has no business being involved in this. Not even with the best intentions, and we all know that's a myth. The only thing the government wants is CONTROL.

Elimination of the government indoctrination camps AND their pill slinging employees would do the most good at every level. But individual parents and families would have to take full responsibility for their children... and I don't see that happening any time soon.

Mack said...

This 'may' be helpful:

* https://www.wired.com/story/trueallele-software-transforming-how-courts-treat-dna-evidence/

Lessons learned there might apply here.