That’s why opposition to large-scale Muslim immigration into Europe (or America) also has little or nothing to do with xenophobia, racism (Muslim is not a race anyway) or nativism. It has to do with changing European values. Large-scale Muslim immigration to Europe will do to Europe’s values what large-scale northern-state immigration has done to Florida and what large-scale European immigration did to the native culture of North America. [More]
First of all,if you subscribe to the Bering Strait land bridge theory, there are no "native Americans." But the point is ceded and recalls
an argument I've made before:
What I would admit to is being a culturist and an ideologist, noting that some cultures and ideologies are superior at encouraging individualism, liberty, prosperity and innovation over others.
[Via Mack H]
4 comments:
DNA evidence has already proved that so-called Amerindians are in fact Asians, all of them.
Further, artifact and limited, but growing DNA evidence proves that Europeans were on the North American continent at least 12,000 years before the first Asian ever came trough Alaska and headed south. See "Across the Atlantic Ice".
Needless to say, the "Out of Africa Theory" has been shown to be so much dung, via DNA evidence. There is no link to be found between Celts and Africans.
Ummm... Megan Markle?
The DNA evidence is more complex that what was once thought:
https://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/11/131120-science-native-american-people-migration-siberia-genetics/
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/342/6157/409.full
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/jan/03/what-the-ancient-dna-discovery-tells-us-about-native-american-ancestry
Sorry, "Anonymous", using National Geographic as a reference for DNA race evidence is about the same as using the New Republic or Mother Jones as an illustration for mainstream politics.
It's useless and a non-starter.
Post a Comment