This guy.SWALWELL WARNS GUN OWNERS: GOVERNMENT COULD NUKE THEM IF THEY DON’T COMPLY WITH POTENTIAL GUN BAN [More]
I've run into such moral defects before. I even wrote an article about it.
My bottom line:
What kind of cowardly slave wouldn’t fight against such bloody tyrants? What patriotic members of the military would wage such a war against their country and the communities they come from?What kind of monster would suggest it?
"Don't be dramatic," Swalwell backtracks. He was being sarcastic.
Besides, what kind of extremist would take up arms against government orders to surrender them?
[Via several of you]
6 comments:
Hm. If one of us would utter a terrorist threat, what would happen to us?
...How many are we... and how many is he?...
...Swallowell can kiss my ass...
In a scenario, as proposed by Swalwell, I can only think to Mike Vanderboegh's "4GW" theory.
Rep. Swalwell forgets something: in every major civil war, there have been units of the military with similar armaments on both sides of the conflict. Just a couple of examples: Russian Civil War, 1918-1921, Spanish Civil War, 1937-1939. In the latter example, the most modern tanks and planes of the era were used in set piece battles reminiscent of WWI. Swalwell is too ignorant or too mired in his own hubris to learn the lessons of history. That such a man is a U.S. Representative is a disgrace. As for those nukes, Rep. Swalwell, don't be worried, ground zero will be the house right next to yours where some guy is refusing to surrender his "assault" rifles. Not to be concerned, we've engineered nuclear blast effects to distinguish between good people like your family and that evil AR-15 owner next door. You won't have any more trouble, we guarantee it, but your yard will need some clean up ;-)
This incites the iconic movie quote:
Wolverines!!
This shitbag needs to have his name known far and wide among the Gun Community. What kind of people would vote a creature like this into office, anyway?
Post a Comment