Tuesday, September 10, 2019

Pushing Back

NRA Sues San Francisco After Lawmakers Declare It A Terrorist Organization [More]
Their reasons are very good, albeit a bit different from mine, which I'm looking into the feasibility of doing. If NRA wins, I wonder if that will improve chances.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

"When they use phrases like, 'I'll give you my gun when you pry it from my cold, dead hands' on bumper stickers, they are saying reasoned debate about public safety should be met with violence," Stefani said."

You know what I get from that? They think forced confiscation and total civilian disarmament is somehow "reasoned debate about public safety." Funny, I can't for the life of me find where the Bill of Rights is voided because someone doesn't "feel" safe.

Ken Windeler said...

What this does, that is San Francisco declaring the NRA a terrorist organization, is setting the stage for ERPOs to be used as backdoor gun confiscation. CA is expanding the person's who can petition for an ERPO to virtually anyone, therefore NRA members and by extension those of U.S. who might donate to GOA, SAF, post on War on Guns are terrorist in San Fran County.

I have read Florida's ERPO and on paper it looks "reasonable" but California is about to prove to U.S. what "red flag" laws really are.