The text of the Fourth Amendment, after all, prohibits “unreasonable searches and seizures” (emphasis added), and here there is necessarily “reasonable suspicion” for a Terry stop to be lawful. [More]Cherry-picking, are we? The text of the Fourth Amendment also says "no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
But hey, a majority of robed oath-breakers say it's precedent, and after all, we do live in the land of stare decisis über alles.
Could it be that ignoring the Constitution has resulted in the very types of people Mr. Adams warned us about? And the "solution" is ignoring the Constitution even more?
"Rudy did it first" is hardly justification. If Rudy jumped off a bridge, would Josh follow? Rudy has done a lot of stupid sh!+.
My Mom never accepted that excuse from me when I was a kid trying to mitigate my guilt by blaming the influence of a pal, and it's disturbing to see a lawyer and an influencer of young minds using it to defend infringements.
So Mr. Sickl... I mean, Hammer is a "conservative"...?
[Via Mack H]
1 comment:
He’s certainly getting no traction at all in the comments section.
Post a Comment