That expression of “confidence” is not a guarantee and has no authority to override enacted law. Relying on “judgment” (with an “appropriate” qualifier) and “discretion” is an admission that any such decisions will hinge on how enforcers choose to respond to a given situation and detainee. It also means a mask charge could be tacked on to an inadvertent violation where no criminal intent exists. (Case in point, how much “discretion” could be involved in defining “partially exposed”?) [More]Forgive me if I question the reliability of opinions from an agency that told women to defend themselves by vomiting or using a rat tail comb.
Friday, May 01, 2020
ISP’s Weak ‘Assurances’ on Masked Concealed Carry Offer No Guarantees
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Now, if you're interested in practical tactics to lower your risk, just go to Harbor Freight, get one of these, and wear it while you open carry. Instant hassle repellant.
https://www.harborfreight.com/reflective-mesh-vest-3604.html
Post a Comment